What stands out here?
People aged 16+ with a degree or equivalent: 61.4% here, compared with 43% across Trafford (18.5 percentage points higher).
Qualifications show local skills, not whether people have secure jobs or use those skills at work.
21 March 2021 · ward and council use the same source, measure and date.
Why this comparison is valid
The difference is in percentage points. The wider figure is the published council total, not the average of its wards. Differences describe groups, not every resident.
Source → A proposed response →Homes rented from a council or housing association: 4% here, compared with 15% across Trafford (11.3 percentage points lower).
The share of social housing describes the homes already here. It does not show the current waiting list or whether enough suitable homes are available.
21 March 2021 · ward and council use the same source, measure and date.
Why this comparison is valid
The difference is in percentage points. The wider figure is the published council total, not the average of its wards. Differences describe groups, not every resident.
Source → A proposed response →Households facing two or more measured disadvantages: 6.5% here, compared with 15.3% across Trafford (8.8 percentage points lower).
These households met at least two census conditions covering education, employment, health and housing. This is not an income or poverty measure.
21 March 2021 · ward and council use the same source, measure and date.
Why this comparison is valid
The difference is in percentage points. The wider figure is the published council total, not the average of its wards. Differences describe groups, not every resident.
Source → A proposed response →The ward in numbers
People aged 65 or over
16.3%21 March 2021 · Hale
Show the workings
Complete Census output-area counts summed using official 2026 best-fit ward lookup
All usual residents
1,825 out of 11,218.
Source and method →People reporting bad or very bad health
2.1%21 March 2021 · Hale
Show the workings
Complete Census output-area counts summed using official 2026 best-fit ward lookup
All usual residents; self-reported, not age-standardised
235 out of 11,201.
Source and method →People counted in the census
11,20021 March 2021 · Hale
Show the workings
Complete Census output-area counts summed using official 2026 best-fit ward lookup
All usual residents
11,200 out of 11,200.
Source and method →People aged 16+ with a degree or equivalent
61.4%21 March 2021 · Hale
Show the workings
Complete Census output-area counts summed using official 2026 best-fit ward lookup
Residents aged 16 and over
5,370 out of 8,741.
Source and method →Households facing at least one measured disadvantage
30.5%21 March 2021 · Hale
The census checks education, employment, health and housing. This is not a measure of income or poverty.
Show the workings
Complete Census output-area counts summed using official 2026 best-fit ward lookup
All households
1,358 out of 4,452.
Source and method →Households facing two or more measured disadvantages
6.5%21 March 2021 · Hale
The census checks education, employment, health and housing. This is not a measure of income or poverty.
Show the workings
Complete Census output-area counts summed using official 2026 best-fit ward lookup
All households
288 out of 4,452.
Source and method →Residents aged 16+ outside the labour market
32.5%21 March 2021 · Hale
Show the workings
21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly.
All usual residents aged 16 and over
2,844 out of 8,739.
Source and method →Residents aged 16+ in work
65.2%21 March 2021 · Hale
Show the workings
21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly.
All usual residents aged 16 and over
5,702 out of 8,739.
Source and method →Residents aged 16+ not working because of long-term illness or disability
1.2%21 March 2021 · Hale
Show the workings
21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly.
All usual residents aged 16 and over
105 out of 8,739.
Source and method →People aged 16+ with no qualifications
7%21 March 2021 · Hale
Show the workings
Complete Census output-area counts summed using official 2026 best-fit ward lookup
Residents aged 16 and over
614 out of 8,741.
Source and method →Homes rented privately
18%21 March 2021 · Hale
Show the workings
Complete Census output-area counts summed using official 2026 best-fit ward lookup
All households
796 out of 4,461.
Source and method →Residents aged 16+ retired
20%21 March 2021 · Hale
Show the workings
21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly.
All usual residents aged 16 and over
1,747 out of 8,739.
Source and method →Homes rented from a council or housing association
4%21 March 2021 · Hale
Show the workings
Complete Census output-area counts summed using official 2026 best-fit ward lookup
All households
165 out of 4,461.
Source and method →Residents aged 16+ unemployed
2.2%21 March 2021 · Hale
Show the workings
21 March 2021, residents aged 16 and over. Includes full-time students in the corresponding work/unemployment categories. Not a current labour-market estimate or the usual 16–64 employment rate. Census took place during the coronavirus pandemic; furlough and lockdown affected answers. Ward counts sum complete official output-area best-fit membership; privacy adjustment can make totals differ slightly. Unemployed residents as a share of all residents aged 16+; this is not the unemployment rate among economically active people.
All usual residents aged 16 and over
193 out of 8,739.
Source and method →Crime and safety
Police UK publication gap, checked 2026-10-17: Greater Manchester Police: Currently no crime, outcome or stop and search data is available. The force is progressing towards a new IT system and data processes which will support provision of data to police.uk in the future. Some data is available directly from GMP website here: https://www.gmp.police.uk/police-forces/greater-manchester-police/areas/greater-manchester-force-content/sd/stats-and-data/ Greater Manchester Police: Crime data not provided for August 2026. The force will provide a data refresh as soon as possible. A complete two-year ward comparison is therefore withheld; other forces’ nearby records are not substituted.
Source and coverage explanation →
Source and coverage explanation →